|
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
No, Plastic ducting is not usually suitable for movement of particles (i.e. dust/shavings) as these may require a higher velocity than the duct is designed for and may pose an explosion risk. Legislation requires that ductwork for wood dust must be conductive, i.e. steel. For some fumes non metal duct may be preferable. The properties of the fume concerned needs to be checked for compatibility with the specific duct construction (i.e. temperature, corrosion etc)
|
||||
|
There are two main reasons why it is not suitable, these are:
(1)
Risk of Static generated sparks igniting a dust explosion.
(2) Plastic Ductwork is
usually designed for low velocities In addition, plastic ducting may leak dust when used at the high velocities necessary to keep the dust/shavings moving through the ductwork.
UPVC and PP technical information:
Electrical Classification - an insulator. The surface resistivity of both UPVC and PP is greater than 1014 ohms and electrostatic charge can therefore accumulate easily.
Fire Characteristics
IF YOU ARE USING PLASTIC DUCTWORK YOU MUST CHECK THE MANUFACTURER’S SPECIFICATION FOR RECOMMENDED MAXIMUM AIRFLOW VELOCITY AND STATIC DISCHARGE PROPERTIES.
|
||||
|
